Skip to contentAbout Fig Group

Supplier Risk Monitoring

Continuous third-party monitoring with control assessments and risk scoring.

The challenge

Does this sound familiar?

Third-party vendor risk is assessed once per contract, then forgotten. Supplier compliance drifts. Breaches at critical partners go undetected until they impact you.

How Fig helps

Supplier Risk Monitoring with Fig

Continuous Assessments

Automated control assessments via questionnaires, audit reports, and external scanning. Compliance status refreshes monthly without manual chase-ups.

Risk Scoring

Suppliers scored by controls coverage, remediation responsiveness, and breach history. Portfolio risk visualised by criticality and risk tier. Integrates with SecurityScorecard, BitSight, and EcoVadis for external risk signals.

Fig Supplier Risk Monitoring platform view
Core Capability

Fig maps supplier dependencies to surface single points of failure and concentration risk. The supplier management module adjusts risk scoring and control requirements dynamically based on each supplier's profile.

Incident Propagation

Supplier breaches, CVEs, and compliance lapses trigger automatic risk recalculation and escalation workflows for dependent systems.

Audit Trail

Complete vendor risk history documented for regulatory oversight. Assessment responses and remediation evidence pre-packaged for auditors. Includes data processing agreement (DPA) lifecycle management and sub-processor cascade tracking.

Audit-ready workflow

How Supplier Risk Monitoring becomes evidence

Supplier Risk Monitoring should not be treated as a standalone tool surface. In Fig it is part of a governed workflow: a signal is captured, an owner is assigned, a control or risk is updated, and evidence is retained so the organisation can prove what happened later.

Lifecycle

Where it sits in the operating model

The Protect phase is where this capability sits in the wider Fig operating model. Third-party vendor risk is assessed once per contract, then forgotten. Supplier compliance drifts. Breaches at critical partners go undetected until they impact you. Fig turns that problem into a repeatable lifecycle so MSPs, risk teams, and auditors are not relying on static spreadsheets or ad hoc screenshots when a buyer asks for proof.

Evidence captured

What auditors and buyers see

For supplier risk monitoring, useful evidence normally includes the triggering record, the affected asset or supplier, the control requirement, the assigned owner, the decision made, the timestamp, and the outcome. That evidence is mapped back to frameworks such as Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, GDPR, CMMC, and internal policy requirements where relevant.

Implementation checks

Four steps to roll this out

  • 01Define who owns supplier risk monitoring and what events should trigger review.
  • 02Connect the relevant source systems so evidence is collected continuously.
  • 03Map outputs to the frameworks and policies that matter to the organisation.
  • 04Review exceptions, accepted risks, and overdue actions before audit or renewal.

Useful references

Independent sources buyers and auditors recognise

The exact evidence required still depends on your scope, risk profile, sector, and framework obligations.

Built for you

Who uses this?

MSPs & MSSPs

Third-party risk management for your entire client base. White-label vendor assessments and risk reporting strengthen your MSP compliance story.

Learn more

Security & risk teams

Board and risk committee visibility into supplier compliance. Automate vendor audits and reduce due diligence workload for procurement and legal teams.

Learn more

Compliance & audit

Documented vendor risk assessments, remediation tracking, and breach impact analysis for third-party risk control audits.

Learn more

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Do suppliers have to complete questionnaires?

Fig offers multiple assessment paths: automated external scans (no supplier action), questionnaires (email-based), and integration with vendor risk platforms. Choose the path that suits your supplier relationships.

How do we identify critical suppliers?

You define supplier criticality based on data access, system dependencies, or regulatory scope. Risk scores then emphasise critical suppliers, ensuring your team focuses remediation efforts where impact is highest.

How many suppliers can we monitor?

There is no limit. Fig scales from a handful of critical suppliers to hundreds of vendors. Risk scoring and alerting apply consistently regardless of portfolio size.

What if a supplier refuses to complete an assessment?

Fig flags non-responsive suppliers and escalates them through your defined workflow. You can also assess non-responsive suppliers using external scanning data alone, which gives you a partial risk score without requiring any supplier action.

Can we share supplier risk reports with our own customers?

Yes. MSPs can generate white-labelled supplier risk summaries for their clients. Reports show assessment status, risk scores, and remediation progress without exposing your internal methodology or scoring logic.

Next step

See Supplier Risk Monitoring in action.

Book a walkthrough tailored to your frameworks and tooling.