Tugboat Logic (now part of OneTrust Certification Automation) focuses on ISO 27001 and SOC 2 evidence automation. Fig Group is the UK-resident alternative with IASME-licensed Cyber Essentials built in, a published 6-hour certification guarantee, and a multi-tenant MSP workflow.
Capability-by-capability comparison between Fig Group and Tugboat Logic (OneTrust Certification Automation)
| Capability | Fig Group | Tugboat Logic (OneTrust Certification Automation) |
|---|---|---|
| UK-resident data and support | US-primary | |
| IASME-licensed Cyber Essentials certification included | ||
| 6-hour Cyber Essentials turnaround guarantee | ||
| Multi-tenant MSP architecture | Limited | |
| Governance-first control plane (policy drives evidence, not reverse) | Checklist-first | |
| Integrated vulnerability management and EPSS/KEV prioritisation | Add-on | |
| Embedded cyber insurance distribution | ||
| Frameworks supported | 65+ incl. Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001, NIS2, SOC 2, DORA, CS&R, DCC | Depends on package |
| Published Cyber Essentials pricing | From £299.99 + VAT | Not applicable - no CE delivery |
Buyer-fit analysis
This page was last reviewed on 27 April 2026. We separate certificate delivery, platform fit, MSP workflow, and procurement risk so the comparison is useful rather than just a vendor scorecard.
Where Fig is the cleaner fit
Tugboat Logic now sits in the OneTrust ecosystem. Fig is the cleaner fit when the immediate problem is CE certification, support, and reusable evidence rather than consolidation into a larger enterprise suite.
Fig is better suited where an MSP owns delivery across clients and needs a multi-tenant operating workflow rather than a single enterprise GRC instance.
If CE is the urgent gate and ISO 27001 follows later, Fig keeps the first certificate quick while preserving evidence for the broader programme.
Where Tugboat Logic (OneTrust Certification Automation) may be the cleaner fit
If privacy, risk, vendor management, and certification work already sit inside OneTrust, extending that suite can be operationally simpler.
For large enterprise teams buying a broad governance suite, OneTrust may fit procurement and internal ownership better than a CE-first workflow.
Claims to verify before buying
How to read this
It is which route fits the buyer's certification, data residency, MSP, and assurance requirements. Fig is strongest where Cyber Essentials certification, IASME-licensed assessment, UK support, published pricing, and MSP delivery are part of the requirement. Tugboat Logic (OneTrust Certification Automation) may still be the better choice where its existing product focus, contract position, or implementation model is already aligned to the buyer.
Step 01
A formal certificate, a compliance automation platform, a consultancy engagement, or a mixture. Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus must be delivered through an IASME-licensed certification body; generic compliance automation alone does not issue the official certificate.
Step 02
If the job is to pass Cyber Essentials quickly, the decisive evidence is IASME licence status, assessor responsiveness, price, re-submission policy, and certificate turnaround. If the job is broader governance automation, the decisive evidence is control ownership, policy workflow, evidence retention, and renewal support.
Buyer checklist
Official sources
Best fit · Fig Group
Best fit · Tugboat Logic (OneTrust Certification Automation)
Next step
Cyber Essentials certification, IASME licence, 6-hour turnaround, MSP multi-tenant - Fig publishes the capability set. See pricing or talk to an assessor.
We only load non-essential analytics and advertising tags after explicit consent. You can review our cookie register in the cookie policy section and update your choice at any time via “Cookie settings” in the footer.